Doctoral Course Offerings, Fall 2003

PHI 600 PLATO

CLYDE LEE MILLER, MONDAY, 3:30-6:30 P.M. HARRIMAN 249

In this course we will study the Meno, Republic, Parmenides (in Part), Theaetetusand Sophist. Students will be expected to read carefully and imaginatively, write up a summary of at least one class, participate in discussian in class, and write four brief papers (3-5pp.each) during the course of the semester. The one-volume edition of the complete dialogues and letter published by Hackett can be purchased at Stony Books across from the railroad station.

PHI 612 PSYCHOANALYSIS

E. CASEY, MONDAY, 7:00-10:00 P.M., HARRIMAN HALL 249

Psychoanalysis. An explaination of philosophical issues raised by psychoanalytic theory and practice:e.g., to the role of affect and emotion in the context of drives and instincts. Close readings from selected texts by Freud will form the core of the course. Other authors may include Jacques Lacan, Melanie Kein, Andre Green, and Hans Loewald - along with philosophical commentaries by figures such as Jacques Derrida, Theresa Brennan, and Richard Boothby.

PHI 615 FEMINISM (CROSS-LISTED WITH WST 601)

RITA ALFONSO, TUESDAY, 2:20-5:20 P.M. HARRIMAN 214

Feminist Epistemologies: Knowledge, Ignorance, and Action

Epistemology is the study of knowledge - of what we can know, and how we can know it. Mainstream epistemology seeks to found universal theories of Truth, to develop the means to achieving objectivity, and to discover a deep structure of human language and an intelligible reality. Feminist epistemologists, on the other hand, argue that knowledge is always partial, situated, and embodied. In this course, we will study several themes and theories of knowledge developed by feminists working out of analytic, pragmatist, continental, queer and postcolonial contexts: standpoint theories, situated knowledges, the matrix of power/knowledge, the workings of epistemic privilege, the pragmatist link between knowledge and action, and the role of emotions, embodiment, and desire in knowledge. The capstone for this course will be a study of the emerging "epistemologies of ignorance." We will read the piece by Charles Mills where the term is coined (in a postcolonial context), and then study the workings of ignorance in the production of knowledge about race, sex/gender, and sexuality.

Some of the questions that will be raised by these materials include:
  • How different/similar is the work of feminists working within different traditions on the questions of knowledge?
  • Should we preserve the term "feminist epistemologies," working to expand on it, or do we need a new term in order to recognize how far feminism has moved beyond the original questions, posed in the context of analytic philosophy.
  • What role does feminist politics play in the projects of feminist epistemologists?
  • How does ignorance drive or derail our knowledge claims?
  • What are we privileged to know, but also privileged not to know?
Course Objectives:
  • To gain familiarity with feminist theories of knowledge emerging from analytic, continental, pragmatist, queer and postcolonial contexts.
  • To explore our own subject positions as subject who can know; what we know/don't know; and how we know or ignore knowing.
  • To lead the class in discussion on at least one article.
  • To write an article length paper on a theme in feminist theories of knowledge.

PHI 616, PHILOSOPHY AND TECHNOLOGY: TECHNOSCIENCE

DON IHDE, MONDAY, 12:00-3:00 P.M., HARRIMAN HALL 249

This term the technoscience research seminar will examine feminist critics and theoreticians who address science and technology. Primary figures will include: Donna Haraway, Sandra Harding, Evelyn Fox-Keller among others. The 'science wars' have often included protests and defenses against feminist critics, but in several cases these critics are themselves from science disciplines. In addition, we will examine several concrete examples of differences which have followed women's participation in research programs within particular sciences. The seminar will continue its format of reading living authors, with participants doing short presentations followed by critical discussions. Each participant should have a working reseach project which will also be discussed in the seminar.

Technoscience continues as an Interface seminar with its unusual format which includes:

*Readings in philosophies of science and technology, science studies and humanities and social science perspectives upon the sciences;

*reading living authors, some of whom are "roasted" upon invitation [spring term has a commitment from Bruno Latour, Paris/Harvard, TBA];

themes changing with seminar participants involved in choices.

Participants can expect to do fast readings, make presentations and develop a working research project during the seminar.

PHI 630, HUSSERL'S TRANSCENDENTAL PHENOMENOLOGY

DONN WELTON, THURSDAY, 6:00-9:00 p.m. HARRIMAN 249

20th Century Continental Philosophy finds not only its wellspring but also one of its most suggestive formations in the thought of Edmund Husserl. This seminar, designed for doctoral students, will attempt to combine a broad analysis of the scope and depth of Husserl's philosophy with an in-depth reading of his seminal lecture manuscript on the problem of what he called passive synthesis. I will take responsibility for the first, basing my comments on texts from different periods of Husserl's writings; it will fall to you to cover the second by leading discussions of the passage selected for that evening.

For students unfamiliar with Husserl I recommend readings Dan Zahavi's Husserl's Phenomenolgy ( Stanford, 2003) over the summer. We will use the following texts in seminar;

  1. The Essential Husserl. ed by Donn Welton ( Indiana University Press, 1999)
  2. Edmund Husserl, Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis, trans by Tony Steinbock ( Kluwer,2002)
  3. Donn Welton, The Other Husserl (Indiana University Press 2000)
  4. The New Husserl (Indiana University Press, summer 2003)
The volumes published by Indiana can be purchsed from me at author's cost: I am presently negotiating to get a special student price on Husserl's Analyses volume, thus allowing you to buy groceries for the month. In addition to one or two discussion reports, each student will do either (a) term paper on a topic decided upon with the instructor ;or (b) a take-home examination to be completed over three days. Students who opt for (a) but have not completed it by December 11 will be required to do (b).

PHI 631, SEMINAR IN ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY

RITA NOLAN, THURSDAY, 12:00-3:00 p.m. HARRIMAN 249

A leading conception of analytic philosophy is that philosophy advances understanding not by promulgating doctrines but by inquiring about what is not understood. I like this conception and so, it seems, does Bernard Williams when he says in his recent work, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy, that he aims to do "philosophy before it becomes history." Accordingly, I propose to focus the seminar on the questions that Williams raises in this book and to use the book as a springboard for further philosophical inquiry.

Williams's main question is "What is the value of truth?" It arises from contemporary tension between suspicion of being deceived (no one likes to be fooled) and skepticism about whether objective truth exists at all (no one likes to be na€ve). He proposes to pursue his inquiry by means of a fictional genealogy, a "State of Nature" story. (His sources for this idea are left for the reader to discern.) Accordingly, a second question arises, "What are the varieties of genealogical accounts in philosophy, how do they differ, and what use are they?"

In the course of Williams's inquiry, considerations from many thinkers are discussed and related philosophical questions arise. Decisions about which of these and others shall be pursued in depth will be made by the seminar members, individually or communally, as appropriate. Thucydides and Herodotus, Apel and Habermas, Tarski, Dummett, and Davidson, Plato and Nietzsche, Rousseau and Diderot, Foucault, Latour, and Rorty are a few Williams mentions, and there is room in the seminar agenda for inclusion of work by other philosophers who have contributed to this topic, perhaps, for example, Quine and Carnap, Cormier and Peirce. Since the seminar is in analytic philosophy rather than intellectual biography or history of ideas, inquiry rather than person is the focus throughout.

Philosophical questions that Williams raises concern cultural diversity, historical truth, naturalism and reduction, perhaps an ample enough menu, but we'll have the option to follow other paths as they arise in the course of inquiry.

CLT 602, POSTMODERNISMS

HUGH SILVERMAN, MONDAY, 7:00-10:00 P.M.

What does it mean to be postmodern? What are the differences between the modern and the postmodern? What is the relation between postmodernism and post-modernity? How have those differences been articulated by various contemporary literary, philosophical, and art theorists? In what sense are there many different postmodernisms?

The purpose of this seminar is to articulate what is meant by the postmodern and postmodernism, to read a number of contemporary theorists who have addressed this issue directly or indirectly, and to explore how these terms are appropriate for the reading of literary, art, architectural, and theoretical texts. The seminar will develop what is meant by the postmodern sublime, postmodern textuality, and postmodern politics.

Readings will address specifically debates around deconstruction, postmodern hermeneutics, and postmodernism in the arts and in political theory.

Texts will include selections from the writings of Foucault (Order of Things), Derrida (Acts of Literature), Kristeva (Portable Kristeva, ed. Oliver), Deleuze & Guattari (Kafka), Lyotard (The Inhuman), Baudrillard ( Simulations and Simulacra), Perniola (Ritual Thinking), and Nancy (Being Singular Plural).

PHI 623, TEACHING PRACTICUM

B. EDWARDS, TUESDAY, 9:00-12.00 P.M., HARRIMAN 249

The Teaching Practicum is directed to students planning to teach their own course in the following academic year. The Practicum meets by-weekly. Topics: contents, teaching methods, syllabi, and general management of classes. Various speakers from the larger university community will give presentations according to their respective areas of expertise (teaching writing, assessing performance, dealing with plagiarism, potential legal problems, composition of S.B.âs undergraduate population, structuring lectures, etc.).